EVE Search - Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 23 post(s)
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.21 15:53:00 - [1] Will titans be able to initiate warp, then activate DD, and still warp off or will activating the DD stop your warp drive no matter what?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.21 16:00:00 - [2] Hel bonus: +5% to fighter and fighter bomber top speed This worthy?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.22 17:00:00 - [3] What about instead of a projected ecm burst, it is a bubble that emmits from the super carrier. And anyone in that bubble does not appear in local channel?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.22 17:09:00 - [4] Originally by: NedFromAssembly Originally by: Marlona Sky What about instead of a projected ecm burst, it is a bubble that emmits from the super carrier. And anyone in that bubble does not appear in local channel? Incase they missed the cyno, the MS on scan, the pos it is likely sitting at, and the cov ops they have staring at you after you lit the cyno. But hey you dont ****ing show up in local. True, maybe throw in area cloak or something. But the remote ecm burst is kinda crap for a supper carrier (mom) exclusive module.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.22 20:02:00 - [5] Originally by: Rodent Originally by: Marlona Sky But the remote ecm burst is kinda crap for a supper carrier (mom) exclusive module. You appear to be about as smart as Zeveron. This is not a good thing. Leave the Remote ECM burst as it is. It's awesome. If it was a giant multi-spec jammer then yeah. I am not saying it is not useful in its current form, I am saying it should be more powerful of a module.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.22 21:41:00 - [6] Originally by: NedFromAssembly Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: Rodent Originally by: Marlona Sky But the remote ecm burst is kinda crap for a supper carrier (mom) exclusive module. You appear to be about as smart as Zeveron. This is not a good thing. Leave the Remote ECM burst as it is. It's awesome. If it was a giant multi-spec jammer then yeah. I am not saying it is not useful in its current form, I am saying it should be more powerful of a module. Yes when I think powerful module I think multispec sigh Let me clarify for you. Remote ECM Burst should jam everything within the burst radius. So instead of just making people lose thier lock, they are jammed for 20 seconds as well. Does this clarify it for you?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.23 09:04:00 - [7] Edited by: Marlona Sky on 23/12/2009 09:04:17 Originally by: NedFromAssembly Originally by: Marlona Sky sigh Let me clarify for you. Remote ECM Burst should jam everything within the burst radius. So instead of just making people lose thier lock, they are jammed for 20 seconds as well. Does this clarify it for you? Yup, I already posted that exact request a few pages back. Thanks for taking the time to read the thread before posting. You said some duration on it. I am suggesting 20 seconds. I was simply being specific. I have read every single post you have made in this thread. In most of these threads, even if you do give some feedback on the topic, it also comes with some form of troll to the poster. I think you will find COAD to be more your style. Have a wonderful day NedFromAssembly.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.23 15:48:00 - [8] Originally by: NedFromAssembly In summary, stop being dumb. Impossible to make a comment without being an ass?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.12.23 17:13:00 - [9] Originally by: NedFromAssembly Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: NedFromAssembly In summary, stop being dumb. Impossible to make a comment without being an ass? Is my alliance ticker not showing? And goonswarm emo rages about how no one takes them seriously when it comes to things like this. Take your stupid ass outta here and get back to COAD.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.01 23:35:00 - [10] Originally by: ByFstugan Originally by: NedFromAssembly Edited by: NedFromAssembly on 01/01/2010 22:29:03 So you seriously can't press a button twice in 15 seconds? Because if you can kazam they are firing for max dps. Oh my bad I just saw your alliance ticker, that answers a lot ^_^ If your argument is BUT THESE DONT WORK IN HEAVY LAG. Then dont even bother responding. Damn near nothing works for decent dps in heavy lag. I see that you still ask yourself what my argument is, and that you still fail to understand both what I said and why your "solution" isn't a solution. Just ignore him. He has offered no constructive feed back at all and anything that might hint as feedback on the topic is laced with non-stop trolling on everyone else in this thread. He is getting emotional because you are set negative to his alliance and therefore is confused into thinking he should treat this thread like it is posted in COAD.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.05 06:00:00 - [11] Originally by: LoveKebab To fix the Hel we break the Nyx.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.05 08:05:00 - [12] Originally by: ByFstugan Gallente Carrier Skill Bonuses: - 5% bonus to effectiveness of Information Warfare Links per level I am not saying that this is a bad idea, but that bonus for Gallente is worthless. The info gang links are used less than 1% of the time for a reason, it is a horrible set of bonuses. Maybe they could change that to something worth fitting and then it would be cool. Again I am not saying that overall the 5% to the racial gang links is bad, its just for the Nyx, it would not mean a thing. Now if they changed the Info links to drone related bonuses... then we would be on to something...
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.10 09:52:00 - [13] Edited by: Marlona Sky on 10/01/2010 09:52:56 I know it would seem more like an Amarr bonus but here goes. I was trying to think along the idea of "Capital Killer" Hel bonus: 10% to nos/neutralizer range, less capacitor used and cap/neutralizer amount. Not sure if 10% is enough or not, but whatever. Something different and would definitely put a hurt on capitals.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.10 21:13:00 - [14] Originally by: LoveKebab why r ppl trying to be awsome and comming up with ACTIVE bonus while other motherships got passive one is beyond me ... aeon - PASSIVE bonus for resists wyvern - PASSIVE bonus for resists nyx - PASSIVE bonus for dmg and u comming up with 20% bonus for nos? Originally by: Marlona Sky 20% to nos/neutralizer range, less capacitor used and cap/neutralizer amount. Yes I know at level 5 it would mean it uses no Capacitor to use the neutralizers but I don't think that would be too crazy. What do ya'll think? i think u dont have ms :) I said neutralizer did I not? I only included nos cause it seems that any bonus that affects neutralizers also affects nos on any other ship. But hey, enjoy your rr bonus. If I posted with an alt not in a corp you are still butt hurt about would your post still be the same?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 01:20:00 - [15] Originally by: LoveKebab i didnt mean to troll u dude ^^ but there is probably something u didnt understand, the 2nd bonus (right after capital rr crap) is usually a passive one and, giving the fact 3 out of 4 motherships got it like this, should not be made so it require a module activation SO u do not want a nos/neut bonus cuz it would still apply to 1-2 highslot tops since i dont know ppl who actually fit 2 neuts on their motherships, also there is no capital neut so u wouldnt rly be able to nuke caps cap, just sayn' and yea :) my post would probably be the same :P since i was commenting on ur idea, not ur corp/alliance :) Ok. So should the Hel bonus BE passive? Some people want a tank bonus, others something that would increase the bomber/fighter damage. Almost all motherships I know of do fit neuts so I thought maybe something that would benefit those would work. 20 bombers/fighters + 12x effective pimped out heavy neuts that cyle fast and have great range would not be a good combo? After all Minmitar is usually split weapon system anyways. Other than smartbombs which I really would think would be pointless I can't think of any other weapons that moms use. Just trying to think outside of the box. Minmitar should have something that is unique and not the same thing as one of the other moms and yet, a very worthwhile bonus.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 04:08:00 - [16] Originally by: LoveKebab Originally by: Marlona Sky Ok. So should the Hel bonus BE passive? Some people want a tank bonus, others something that would increase the bomber/fighter damage. Almost all motherships I know of do fit neuts so I thought maybe something that would benefit those would work. 20 bombers/fighters + 12x effective pimped out heavy neuts that cyle fast and have great range would not be a good combo? After all Minmitar is usually split weapon system anyways. aye, but the weapon systems from subcapital ships dont apply to moms - if they would, u would have nyx with blasters :) if u want pimped neut u can use officer one besides motherships can launch up to 20 neut drones too and they are limited to whatever control range u got (20 of those work pretty well too) Originally by: Marlona Sky Other than smartbombs which I really would think would be pointless I can't think of any other weapons that moms use. Just trying to think outside of the box. Minmitar should have something that is unique and not the same thing as one of the other moms and yet, a very worthwhile bonus. smartbombs on a mothership are pretty cool for selfdefence (from other drones, from ships orbiting under the sbomb range) the problem is there isnt rly anything "unique" left to be given tbh and for now we came up with either dps (rof in this case) or ehp as multiplying other ships bonus is just pointless and wouldnt make hel any better from the other ship with the same bonus - for example if u would give hel raw dps bonus just as nyx u would still go for nyx as it can have more drones and has better tank type same goes for Aeon and Wyvern - even tho both got the same bonus and pretty much same dronebay ppl r going for aeon more often as it can actually fit something usefull in med slots (tackle, cap rechargers and stuff when the shield tankers not only using meds for tank but if they want more cap stable setups they getting less shield boost - cprs y0) What I was trying to accomplish was when a Hel pilot fit faction/officer neuts on, they would be as if it was a capital neutralizer. So besides that, what other options asides from what has already been suggested that would make it worth flying a Hel over the other moms that would not be a joke.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 06:17:00 - [17] Originally by: ByFstugan Originally by: Marlona Sky What I was trying to accomplish... With risk of forgeting something... I'm not bashing that idea but I just don't want to see yet another Minmitar ship that is so-so at this, and so-so at that. I would prefer a bonus that would mean the Hel is better at <xyz> than the other super carriers.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 08:44:00 - [18] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources I have an awesome idea. Let's get people who don't own or haven't owned supercaps the ** out of this thread. Like you Marlona U mad? Originally by:** Bobbeh Edited by: Bobbeh on 11/01/2010 07:56:11 Originally by: EdFromHumanResources I have an awesome idea. Let's get people who don't own or haven't owned supercaps the ** out of this thread. Like you Marlona Wow Ed Thats Genius.... Unfortunately the HighSec pilots of Eve don't seem to agree with us. I hope they can finish with the lag monster so that they can get back to MS/SC upgrades *Edit sorry i forgot to mention Eft and Excel warriors.... U mad too?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 09:00:00 - [19] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: EdFromHumanResources I have an awesome idea. Let's get people who don't own or haven't owned supercaps the ** out of this thread. Like you Marlona U mad? Originally by:** Bobbeh Edited by: Bobbeh on 11/01/2010 07:56:11 Originally by: EdFromHumanResources I have an awesome idea. Let's get people who don't own or haven't owned supercaps the ** out of this thread. Like you Marlona Wow Ed Thats Genius.... Unfortunately the HighSec pilots of Eve don't seem to agree with us. I hope they can finish with the lag monster so that they can get back to MS/SC upgrades *Edit sorry i forgot to mention Eft and Excel warriors.... U mad too? Not really, I just think everything you've posted in this thread is a waste of space. Kinda like when you log into TQ. If you want to continue this forum warrior chest beating we can take it to COAD if you like. I will still continue to come up with crazy of the wall idea to get shot down everywhere else, including this thread. You can either have constructive feedback or continue your, "No!! Boost what I am currently flying and nerf everything else!" cry baby attitude. Something tells me your incapable of constructive feedback. Please prove me wrong.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 09:34:00 - [20] Originally by: Bobbeh Anyways Can we get an update on dominion 1.1 :D Sure, there still will be no reason to fly a Hel over any of the other super carriers.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.11 16:41:00 - [21] Originally by: hatchette I can delegate them. Don't think this is supposed to be. CCP has said that you will NOT be able to delegate them but I was able to do it just fine. Not sure if they changed thier mind or they have taken a break away from working on super carriers.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.12 01:44:00 - [22] Originally by: keuel well... I don¦t own a SC... Oh crap, don't let Ed see this. As per ED, you are not allowed to have ANY input in this thread at all. None. Zip. Nada.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.12 07:36:00 - [23] Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: keuel well... I don¦t own a SC... Oh crap, don't let Ed see this. As per ED, you are not allowed to have ANY input in this thread at all. None. Zip. Nada. Actually he is an amazing example of why empire pubbies shouldn't be voicing their opinion. He is complaining because a ship designed to kill capitals is gasp killing carriers and dreads when they are in gangs. His $15 a month says otherwise.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.12 08:23:00 - [24] Originally by: Bobbeh Originally by: Marlona Sky His $15 a month says otherwise. P.Sure its CCP's 15$'s the minute he decided to play.... His 15 is next months sub. If As the Atlas man said, If SC/MS were mediocre they would be used reward wouldnt out weigh the risk. They gotta be awesome Cap Killers for someone to wanna put a 14 billion dollar asset out against a dread gang. I am in no way agreeing with the guy. lol Someone drops 20 ships worth 15b each, they better be melting some carrier/dreads. (300 bill vs. 1 bill) It is like when you have 300 bs all shooting 1 bs, the one bs will simply vaporize. The guy mostly likely is not that familiar with what role CCP is trying to make super carriers fit into. Ed is right about size of ships. It is not as simple as just 'click and drag' the to be bigger like a window on the screen.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.12 08:37:00 - [25] Originally by: Bobbeh stuff about shields I can't seem to find anywhere the reason why shields do not automatically apply when joining gang/entering system. Is there some way to abuse a feature like that? i.e. joining, leaving, joining, etc. a gang to regain low shields to full shields? If not, then it should apply the same way as armor. What is the big deal?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.12 09:01:00 - [26] Originally by: Bobbeh Edited by: Bobbeh on 12/01/2010 08:43:16 Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: Bobbeh stuff about shields I can't seem to find anywhere the reason why shields do not automatically apply when joining gang/entering system. Is there some way to abuse a feature like that? i.e. joining, leaving, joining, etc. a gang to regain low shields to full shields? If not, then it should apply the same way as armor. What is the big deal? It applies like this so you have x amount of shields, when you jump into a system the fleet bonus of Y is re applied. So your total Shields is X+Y but your Shield Starts at X Not at X+Y. This means that when a shield tanked ship jumps into a system its missing Y percentage of its tank before it even engages in a fight. This also happens when fleet booster changes, Or if you Discon and rejoin the fleet. Armor hit points are Calculated the same but THey start at X+Y when they jump in so no repping is needed I know how the game mechanic works. My question is what was the motivation behind the decision to make it the way it is, instead of like the way armor applies when in a gang. CCP?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.23 09:02:00 - [27] New Hel bonus is sweet. Good thing we were able to come up with 20+ ideas that were better than that remote repair bonus. I was worried the Hel would be overlooked for Dominion 1.1 patch.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.30 11:01:00 - [28] Originally by: wallenbergaren Still doesn't make much sense that the Nyx does 25% more than the others though. It's fine for Carriers since they're not DPS ships but Supercarriers are Maybe because Gallente are the drone race pretty much.. Originally by: Zeus They reduced the size of FB's to 5k like fighters, but 20 FB and 20 Fighters is still 200k which is max drone bay for Aeon and Wyvern. No room for spares or drones. Not good enough .... better but not good enough , need atleast another 75k Imo. Otherwise Nyx are still overpowered and alot more versatile than all the rest. Better Damage, room for spares and drones.. why fly anything else? :( Yes please, lets make them all the same! This is starting to sound more and more like that ultra tear thread below about the Legion.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.31 09:18:00 - [29] Edited by: Marlona Sky on 31/01/2010 09:18:00 Originally by: Jim Raynor Edited by: Jim Raynor on 31/01/2010 06:38:33 Originally by: Marlona Sky Originally by: wallenbergaren Still doesn't make much sense that the Nyx does 25% more than the others though. It's fine for Carriers since they're not DPS ships but Supercarriers are Maybe because Gallente are the drone race pretty much.. Technically speaking Carriers/Super Carriers use fighters and they are NOT drones... Go to the market and tell me which folder they are listed under then if not the DRONES folder. Originally by: Jim RaynorWell dude, in all honesty the capital ships should have pretty similar performance with each other.. So a Megathron should get the same alpha with its rails as a Tempest does with its artillery? This has to be a troll right?
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.01.31 13:53:00 - [30] Originally by: Jim Raynor Of course they are listed under DRONES where else would they be listed? They are manned fighter craft but they act exactly like DRONES but technically they are not drones. I still see no reason that the Gallente carrier/supercarrier should out perform the other races, it just makes training for any other races carrier suboptimal.. what's the point? Who is trolling who? A Megathron doesn't do as much alpha no.. but it's still a useful sniper and it does generally speaking perform as well as a Tempest. So yes.. a Megathron, Rokh, Tempest, Apoc ect ect should all perform equally well at long ranges.. doesn't mean they have to be exactly the same no... I was trolled.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.02.08 08:38:00 - [31] Originally by: LoveKebab Edited by: LoveKebab on 06/02/2010 15:57:14 change that damn hel bonus lol Why don't you fly a Falcon alt about it. Seriously, the Hel would have been much more appreciated with my idea for a new bonus but no one like the idea.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.03.01 10:38:00 - [32] Edited by: Marlona Sky on 01/03/2010 11:26:51 Originally by: Ezekiel Sulastin So, CCP, about the Hel ... is it getting a good bonus any time soon? :X +500% to mining drone yield amount per level and +500% per level to number of alliances on your blue list. Looks like your tear threads worked. I hope your happy.
Marlona Sky D00M. Triumvirate.	Posted - 2010.03.01 22:22:00 - [33] Originally by: Ezekiel Sulastin Edited by: Ezekiel Sulastin on 01/03/2010 22:09:16 Originally by: Marlona Sky +500% to mining drone yield amount per level and +500% per level to number of alliances on your blue list. Looks like your tear threads worked. I hope your happy. Uhhhmmm, I'm referring to the general consensus by both Abathur and the denizens of this forum that the Hel's rep bonus is substandard for a supercarrier, especially given the other tradeoffs inherent with it compared to a Nyx or Aeon (or even Wyvern). In fact, I posted in here that an ROF bonus equivalent in DPS boost to the Nyx's damage bonus would be one easy to implement solution, and thus give a gank and tank option for both shields and armor. Shield tanking still has issues compared to armor tanking, but those deserve and have gotten their own threads. Forgive me for being worried that CCP's just gonna forget about fixing something they said they would fix, like rockets and AFs and COSMOS and FW etc. Maybe you thought you were still in CAOD where your 'clever' jabs at my alliance have 'relevance'? This is where we discuss trying to fix ships to make them more generally useful for everyone. :yawn: Maybe we should run to the CSM about this issue? To Assembly Hall!!!!!

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.